Archive for the ‘Nursing’ Category

Looking For Work

Thursday, November 9th, 2006

I am in a frenzied madness of looking for employment. There are two concerns that I would like to share: how to share your resumes (and/or cvs aka curriculum vitaes) and how to read these crazy job descriptions.

Everything one applies for requests a resume. They seem to not care about a cover letter and/or a cv. I feel it is very important to send an individualized cover letter with every job application that states your qualities and interests. I submit my “short resume” which is two pages long, as well as my ten page curriculum vitae which some employers appreciate and request.

On the other hand, I am really disappointed by the quality of the job perspectives I find on some job search engines (not their fault). These job descriptions are sometimes lengthy, disorganized, want you to do everything. I find these job descriptions to be so unprofessional, that I have to bite my cheek and apply anyway. These descriptions include everything in addition to cleaning the kitchen sink. Why don’t they describe the half dozen activities that they truly require? If they cannot do that, the employers do not really know what/who they are looking for and create a junk basket of words. Which means if you accept the position, it will be awhile before it is clear what is really expected, which frustrates the employer, and does not bode well for your initial evaluation.

Even though all the recruitment folks recommend that you submit a brief resume, my experience is this: if you have had a long professional career, submit a lot of information, but make it interesting and readable, in small doses i.e. cover letter, short resume, and your lengthier cv (curriculum vitae).

Best wishes.

[tags]looking for employment,curriculum vitaes,recruitment,evaluation[/tags]

The Ridiculosity

Monday, November 6th, 2006

The ridiculosity of recruiting for positions when it is clear the employer wants an internal candidate…

I have experienced several situations in which I have applied for positions in which the job description stated that an internal candidate was preferred who “knew” their system. This generally involved positions that required familiarity with the institution’s research protocols. And I have had the misfortune of applying for positions where this was not stated.

Sometimes during the interview I was told that they would prefer to hire someone who already knew the internal operations of their organization. Why are they wasting my time and theirs?

And at other times, after interviewing well, I was called, only to be told that they “really liked” me but that they had to hire an internal candidate. This has been true for civil service positions, or those that required union membership, or “frozen” positions, usually in public health.

Isn’t this all a bit unfair, unscrupulous, and abuse of my time and integrity? Their time too, though I don’t need to care about that…

Today I had a great interview, for an hour and a half with a manager who was developing laryngitis. I felt bad and should have offered to get her a bottle of water, since I brought one for me. But we were both too busy talking to drink water, which was good. I am being invited back for a second interview with two other persons. And this time I have to have the courage to say “I realize that interviewing and selecting a candidate is difficult. Just as you are interviewing me, I am interviewing you as well. We want this to work for all of us. I don’t want you to waste your time; neither do I want to look for another position from the first day that I am employed by you, which is an experience that I had”.

It is so important to welcome, introduce a new employee. And I spent a year, out of financial necessity, with an insurance company who did not do that. From my first day I knew that my decision to work with them was a disaster, and I began searching for another position.

Speaking of “positions”: think about what you are looking for. Do you want a job, which implies, I believe, unskilled labor, or do you, as a professional, want a “position” which implies bringing education, experience, integrity to your work? And watch your language: do you want to work “for” them, or “with” them?

[tags]ridiculosity,internal candidate,civil service positions,public health,interview,interviewing,insurance company[/tags]